Should Patients with Advanced Dementia Be Tube Fed?
by Laurie Lewis
Diminished food intake is common in patients with advanced dementia,
who may even stop eating entirely. When this happens, health care
professionals may be tempted to insert a feeding tube to assure adequate
nutritional intake. But many care providers, including four physicians
interviewed for this article, suggest a less aggressive approach.
"A patient with advanced dementia who is not eating is far different
from a healthy person who is starving in the desert," said Muriel Gillick,
MD, Physician-in-Chief at the Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged in
Boston.
George Taler, MD, CMD, Director of Long-Term Care at Washington
Hospital in Washington, DC, agreed. "Many of these patients need very
little food because they are physiologically inactive; their bodies have
shut down."
"Nutrition serves a purpose only if the body systems can use it. If the
organ systems are in severe decline and not functioning, nutrition serves
no purpose," said Steven Levenson, MD, CMD, a Multi-Facility Medical
Director in Baltimore, MD, and Chair of Caring's Editorial
Board.
Ladislav Volicer, MD, PhD, Clinical Director, Geriatric Research
Education Clinical Center and Medical Director, Dementia Study Unit at EN
Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital in Bedford, MA, summarized the case
against tube feeding by explaining that "advanced dementia is a terminal
disease. Care is palliative, not curative."
Because palliation is the goal of management of patients with advanced
dementia, the patient's comfort in the absence of full dietary intake must
be considered the primary goal. "A decision to withhold tube feeding
doesn't mean we are abandoning the patient," said Dr. Gillick. "We need to
emphasize what we are going to do rather than what we are not going to
do."
Practice Variations
Although the trend is away from tube feeding for patients with advanced
dementia, such an approach is by no means universal. A survey of nursing
homes in four states found wide variations in tube feeding practices. The
prevalence was as low as 7.5% in Maine and as high as 40.1% in Mississippi
(J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49:148-152). "Such wide
variation in prevalence usually means lack of agreement about whether a
treatment is beneficial," said Dr. Volicer, who is also a member of
Caring's Editorial Board.
He himself has little doubt, however. No patient on Dr. Volicer's
100-bed dementia special care unit has been tube fed in the past 10 years.
The decision to withhold tube feeding is not made by Dr. Volicer or the
staff. Such treatment decisions are left to the patient's family. The staff
explains that advanced dementia is a terminal disease, without hope for
recovery. Family members are assured that staff will make every effort to
get the patient as much nutrition as possible if they decide not to tube
feed. "Once they understand the situation, no family has opted for tube
feeding," Dr. Volicer said. "No family has opted for resuscitation, either,"
he added.
Dr. Taler noted that in advanced stages of a progressive degenerative
disorder such as Alzheimer's disease, tube feeding does not have any
demonstrable effect on the course of the illness or on longevity. "Tube
feeding may not be medically ineffective, but it is medically inadvisable,"
he said. He tells families that tube feeding is optional under these
circumstances and advises against it. If family members insist on tube
feeding, however, he will not try to dissuade them.
For many families, the greatest concern is whether the patient will
suffer or be uncomfortable if he or she is not receiving adequate nutrition.
Because patients in end-stage dementia are unable to communicate their
discomfort in words, the answer is not certain beyond a doubt. "But we
have indirect ways of knowing," said Dr. Gillick. "A patient who is
uncomfortable will moan or thrash about. And cognitively intact patients
who cannot eat and are dying from other diseases, such as cancer, have
told us that they are not uncomfortable except for a dry mouth, and that
can be relieved with ice chips or a few sips of water."
Because their physical and physiologic activity have slowed considerably,
patients with advanced dementia may survive months or even years on
minimal caloric intake. According to Dr. Taler, most patients will lose
weight, but then they reach a plateau and stabilize. He described one
patient with a stage-4 pressure ulcer who consumed only about 600 calories
a day. "She was very thin. But amazingly, the ulcer eventually healed," he
said.
Alternatives to Tube Feeding
Dr. Taler stressed the need to look for remediable explanations for why
a patient with advanced dementia may not be eating enough. Is the patient
depressed? Does she have mouth pain or poorly fitting dentures? Is the
food or the eating environment unappealing? Does the patient need help
with eating? She may have the physical dexterity to get the food from her
plate to her mouth, but does she remember how to use a spoon or fork? Does
she need to be reminded to chew and swallow?
One-on-one eating assistance by a staff member or a trained family
member or volunteer can make a difference in food intake. "It takes more
time to feed a patient by hand than to manage tube feeding. But it's
better for the patient to have normal human contact during eating," said
Dr. Volicer.
Dr. Levenson suggested offering food every few hours. "Offer something
the patient likes even if it is not nutritious, just so the person can
maintain weight," he said.
Liquid nutritional supplements do not need to be fed by tube. They can
be taken orally throughout the day to boost nutritional intake and
maintain hydration.
For the patient's comfort, hydration needs to be assured even if
nutritional intake is minimal. Oral intake is the preferred way to
maintain hydration. Offer small drinks of water at frequent intervals.
If oral hydration is not possible, subcutaneous fluid administration is
preferable to keeping a patient attached to an intravenous apparatus, Dr.
Levenson suggested.
Comfort measures demonstrate to the patient and family that staff still
care despite the patient's terminal status and the decision not to tube
feed. Dr. Gillick mentioned a few caring, nonnutritive comfort measures:
keeping the patient warm; having the patient get out of bed; playing music
the patient might enjoy.
When Tube Feeding is Chosen
The argument against tube feeding applies to patients in the terminal
stage of progressive dementia. The decision whether to tube feed is likely
to be different if a patient with dementia is not at end-stage status. A
patient with an acute, treatable, concomitant illness such as pneumonia or
depression may benefit in the short term from tube feeding. Families
vacillating on the tube feeding decision also might want a short-term
trial to see if it makes any difference in the patient's status.
If a feeding tube will be used for only a short period, a nasogastric
tube is usually inserted. The nasogastric tube can be uncomfortable, and
it needs to be checked and flushed frequently. Plus, as Dr. Taler noted,
"it's hard to kiss your mother when she has a tube in her nose."
When long-term tube feeding is desired, a gastrostomy tube is preferred.
A surgical procedure is required to place the tube, but it is quite safe.
Problems to watch for in a patient with a gastrostomy tube include leakage,
which can irritate the skin around the gastrostomy site, and diarrhea. The
diarrhea may be caused by "dumping syndrome": rapid emptying of gastric
contents into the colon. Also, medications sometimes are changed to elixir
form so that they can be given by tube, and most elixirs contain sorbitol,
which can cause diarrhea.
A patient will not necessarily do better with a feeding tube, Dr. Taler
cautioned, noting that the adequacy of feeding needs to be assessed because
"the patient may not be getting enough nutrition through the tube."
Dr. Taler summarized the decision to tube feed a patient with dementia
with these words: "Choose the patient wisely. If you tube feed, be sure
you are feeding enough."
Medical journalist Laurie Lewis is a Contributing Writer to Caring.
|
This article originally appeared in
Caring for the
Ages, July 2001; Vol. 2, No. 7, p. 1.
Caring for the Ages is an official publication of the American
Medical Directors Association, published by Elsevier. This article may not be
reproduced in any form, print or electronic, without
permission.
The opinions expressed
by the authors are their own
and not necessarily those of AMDA or of Elsevier.
|
back to top
|